Mafia 87: The Play, Basic Game

UN please....just shut up.
Well, Bally was also posting around that time, not that we should be limiting the hit to those that were posting then.
Point is we need to lynch someone. I'm all for lynching those playing innocent, but having "off" games.
The obvious (to me) hit would have been G, Zaf, or Rich. I already was uneasy of Rich, and with him having three votes!!!
Regardless of who pulled the hit it was well played. We all get to tell them great play after the game's over.

Rich at said that he believed that Zaffy was not playing his usual game and you say that you would hit players having an off game and then list Zaffy among them. Do you agree with Rich about Zaffy?



I think I made a 92% on my test, not that great of an A but I'll take it!! :dance:
 
No Bally, I guess that wasn't worded clearly. What I meant was the obvious scum hit I thought would have been one of those three.

Other than Zaf's late vote switch night one, I don't really have a problem with his game play thus far. In fairness though I've played many more games with Rich than Zaffy.

What's your take on the scum hit last night?

G/O Congrats on the "A" G/O
 
2H not very townish to want to vote innocents off. I think we need all the townies we can keep in order to win this thing. You just went up on my scum scale.

Very funny Rich, nice twist. So of the two of us who had there vote on a known innocent the last two days? :nono:
What I told G was that we have to vote someone, and if it's an innocent at least lets vote one who isn't helping the town.

And just for the record Scum don't get scum scales! :laugh:
 
Come on now Rich, you don't have everyones respect here as a great Mafia player by jumping on things like that. It's for things like the hit on Hayden!
 
Based on the rules and the order of nightfall, I thought the hit came after the lynch. Ah well.... it is a FF game. Expect the unusual.

Eh, what can I say? That sums it up perfectly :D


No posting. Your supposed to be wrapped in an eternal wall of duck tape, no one can hear you.

Personally, I'm not sure how in this set up the hit situation would be fair....for the innocents, having it go through before veryone has had a chance to vote....really isn't fair, but for the evils if they don't know a time to have it in by, well it wouldn't give them a chance to change it if they needed before night?
Maybe...the lynch goes through once the correct number of ppl have voted (after 5 the votes are locked), and the hit has been sent in. Then have nightfall?

I think would have been a better plan. I'll do that one for the next nightfall.

Well, Bally is one of my top's also. Along with Rich...they are the two I have suspected the most.
Not really willing to put my vote just yet, no reason to rush. I think I will wait til I get back, read through posts yet again, then vote.
I want to see FF's answer as to if they knew the hit would go through immediately

yes, they knew.

I know I'm not supposed to post, but keep this in mind for sunday if the game last untill then: http://www.aquariacentral.com/forums/announcement.php?f=&a=33

Get out of this thread user! Your dead, you can't talk anymore!

Vote Count:

Rich- 3 - Lg, Bally, Zaffy
2H- 1- Pir
Pir- 0 - LG

8 people left, 5 votes needed for lynch. PMs as required.

G/O Glade you got an A, Bally G/O
 
No Bally, I guess that wasn't worded clearly. What I meant was the obvious scum hit I thought would have been one of those three.

Other than Zaf's late vote switch night one, I don't really have a problem with his game play thus far. In fairness though I've played many more games with Rich than Zaffy.

What's your take on the scum hit last night?

G/O Congrats on the "A" G/O

I was not expecting to come back to the thread and see the hit. I think that it should have happened at the nightfall, or have been more specific in the rules.

I find it convienent for those who are building a case on Rich that hit vote happened at 10:39pm and the hit was posted at 11:00pm on the person that he voted for and then the hit is being used as evidence of him being scum. It seems too coincidental that the hit went in on the person he voted for so quickly after his vote was posted.

FF:
Post 372, Ladg G retracted.

I assume that is why her name is in red.
 
AquariaCentral.com