I'm in a spot where I need to do one or the other. My cabinet is probably pretty poorly laid out in that I don't think I have room for a big external skimmer, so that means in-sump. The sump I'm using is basically an old wet/dry unit from a FW tank with only one partition in it, so it's pretty inflexible with only one section to hold either the macro or skimmer, and the other to hold the return pump, heater, and a little live rock.
The skimmer I have right now is a Tunze that seems to really only work when the water level doesn't change. Since I don't use an ATO, again due to lack of space, I've never been able to get more than a bit of brown water out of this thing. Never a good foam no matter how I adjust it.
I need to get more nutrient export, so would a more suitable skimmer, or macro be a better bet? The macro route would certainly be cheaper and simpler, so that's appealing. But I also wouldn't mind dropping the money on a quality skimmer if I knew it would deal with the small fluctuation (~1-2") in water level, and the extra expense of the skimmer would mean appreciably cleaner water than the macro could do.
The tank is 36 gallons, and there is maybe 100 gph going through the sump.
Any input would be appreciated...
The skimmer I have right now is a Tunze that seems to really only work when the water level doesn't change. Since I don't use an ATO, again due to lack of space, I've never been able to get more than a bit of brown water out of this thing. Never a good foam no matter how I adjust it.
I need to get more nutrient export, so would a more suitable skimmer, or macro be a better bet? The macro route would certainly be cheaper and simpler, so that's appealing. But I also wouldn't mind dropping the money on a quality skimmer if I knew it would deal with the small fluctuation (~1-2") in water level, and the extra expense of the skimmer would mean appreciably cleaner water than the macro could do.
The tank is 36 gallons, and there is maybe 100 gph going through the sump.
Any input would be appreciated...