This is about resource competition under different levels of nutrient fertility
Not allelopathy.
Vals are rarely weeds and weeds tend to do best when nutrients are high and natives tend to do better where nutrients are lower/less.
Come on, this has
nothing to do with in situ alleopathy.
Yawn.........ground up extracts from a plant.........
Are all these papers about extracts and NOT actually plants that are like, alive?
I mean this is what we are talking about,
not grinding up extracts.
Massive difference.
Resource competition effects/structure.
Not much about ecology really here either, extracts.
But your are right that the research is a little bit illogical because they generally use terrestrial plants to show allelopathy in aquatic species. However there is some pretty cool data about how Vals produce algeacides.
Extracts , not in live plants in real systems, big difference.
I've seen some pretty cool examples of allelopathy in my experience with terrestrial plants. The one that sticks out was a cucumber plot trial that was followed immediately by a winter wheat rotation. The next spring you could see exactly where the cucumbers where (rows and alleys!!). The wheat there was 1/2 the size and had a drastically reduced yield. None of the other cucurbits showed any effects.
So why might the concentrations of allelopathic chemicals be very different in water..........you know...where the chemicals can be washed away immediately?
How does the plant know how big the lake they are in is?
Many Vals live in rivers, unidirectional.........how about the chemicals there?
Why do many others have vals and not have issues? That's the kicker. Only takes a few examples to falsify a Val hypothesis.
We also have grown 300+ species together without one verified example of allelopathic issues, plenty of resource competition examples though.
The odds are not in favor of alleopathy.
Ole also made some comments on the topic:
http://www.bio-web.dk/ole_pedersen/pdf/TAG_2002_15_7.pdf
We have different perspectives, but have the same conclusions and thoughts. Ecological allelpopathy is very different than these chemical assay studies as he points out also.
It's very difficult to demonstrate and provide controls for actual in situ ecological studies on allelopathy, and that..........is what is required for evidence.
But....we also have plenty of observations with aquarist that have not seen any evidence of chemical warfare. A good control is to use activated carbon/large water changes etc.........this removes the chemicals and any build up. AC selectively removes organic chemicals like Allelopathy. So if allelopathy is the cause, that would remove it rather fast.
But...we see no evidence using that either.
What else ya got? When I call baloney, I mean it.
Terrestrial soils do not have water washing things away, and allelopathic chemicals do not get washed away. But they still have troubles with controls, not as bad, but there's a lot of things in soils and relationships that are far more complex than hydric soils.
Regards,
Tom Barr